• The Quality Assurance Department and the Institutional Research Office prepares the Quality Review reports and mainly include:
o Admissions Report
o Registrar Report
o Student Affairs Report
o Annual Updated Alumni Data Report
o Course/Instructor Evaluation
o Student Annual Institutional Satisfaction Survey
o Faculty Satisfaction Survey
o Staff Satisfaction Annual Survey
• The Quality Assurance review cycle is done every June and shared with the Quality Assurance Committee to provide recommendations and guidance according to the reports.
• Corrective actions are supervised by the Quality Assurance Department and the Institutional Research Office
• The Committee should convene semi-annually to discuss feedback from Schools and Departments about any QA related matter, in addition to the report presented by the QA Office and IR.
• The Committee, based on this liaising activity, could bring to the Committee's attention the need to introduce new policies not raised in the submitted report.
• The recommendations for policy amendments and introduction of new policies made by the Committee are raised to the University Council for review, and, if approved, are to be raised for approval to the Board of Trustees at the university,
• The Quality Assurance Department and the Institutional Research Office prepares the Quality Review reports and mainly include:
o Admissions Report
o Registrar Report
o Student Affairs Report
o Annual Updated Alumni Data Report
o Course/Instructor Evaluation
o Student Annual Institutional Satisfaction Survey
o Faculty Satisfaction Survey
o Staff Satisfaction Annual Survey
• The Quality Assurance review cycle is done every June and shared with the Quality Assurance Committee to provide recommendations and guidance according to the reports.
• Corrective actions are supervised by the Quality Assurance Department and the Institutional Research Office
• The Committee should convene semi-annually to discuss feedback from Schools and Departments about any QA related matter, in addition to the report presented by the QA Office and IR.
• The Committee, based on this liaising activity, could bring to the Committee's attention the need to introduce new policies not raised in the submitted report.
• The recommendations for policy amendments and introduction of new policies made by the Committee are raised to the University Council for review, and, if approved, are to be raised for approval to the Board of Trustees at the university.